Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill (HL).
Companies Bill [Lords]
My point was about new clause 83(1), which includes the words"““other than a contribution to the union’s political fund””." It may be a legal expression, but I am seeking to clarify what happens according to whether the contribution is direct or indirect. The Minister may want to take further advice. I am raising a technical point, on which I would like some clarification. I accept that we may not obtain it this evening, but any further assistance would be helpful.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c967
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Animal welfare Accountability Company law Community development Companies Directors Business Annual reports Liability Donors Expenditure Exemptions Harassment Ethics Journalism Personal records Membership Political parties Public companies Loans Staff Meetings Private companies Lobbying Registration Trade unions Voting rights Shareholders Huntingdon Life Sciences Business plans
- Legislation
- Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:45:26 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353244
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353244
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353244