Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hanham (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am sure that the Minister will agree that any limited gains that mean that people are not killed are more than a limited gain—they are a very great attribute. I do not have much more to say, except that I clearly stated that our amendment refers to new vehicles. As my noble friend Lord Attlee said, it would not cost very much to put this tape on as vehicles were constructed. It is quite remarkable that this country, which implements EU legislation in a way well beyond that ever demanded or implemented by any other part of Europe, cannot go ahead a little on this and make a regulation that would require this road safety measure. The Minister's reply seems puny, so I beg to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 5A) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 112; Not-Contents, 96. 6: Page 24, line 36, column 4, leave out ““the statutory maximum”” and insert ““12 months (in England and Wales) or six months (in Scotland) or the statutory maximum, or both””


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c334-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Appeals Death Accidents Bridges Dangerous driving Cameras Finance Immobilisation of vehicles Enforcement Level crossings Large goods vehicles Income Local government Railways Roads Safety Road traffic offences Taxis Sentencing Safety measures Road traffic control Testing Speed limits Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk