Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

moved, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 16, leave out ““agree”” and insert ““disagree””. The noble Lord said: My Lords, I thank the Minister for what he has said. I still do not understand why it is not possible to move the penalties for abusing a level crossing up the scale. I am sure that the level of penalty available determines what the courts decide: they have the freedom to use that. Therefore, I should like to seek the opinion of the House on this issue. Moved, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 16, leave out ““agree”” and insert ““disagree””.—(Lord Bradshaw.) On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 16A) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 72; Not-Contents, 81. On Question, Motion agreed to. 17: Leave out Clause 51


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c357-8 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Appeals Death Accidents Bridges Dangerous driving Cameras Finance Immobilisation of vehicles Enforcement Level crossings Large goods vehicles Income Local government Railways Roads Safety Road traffic offences Taxis Sentencing Safety measures Road traffic control Testing Speed limits Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk