Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Joan Ryan (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 30 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on Hague Programme.


Hague Programme

With leave of the House, I should like to reply to the debate, which has been useful and comes at a helpful time, given that the Justice and Home Affairs Council will meet next week. We take the Select Committee report seriously and are pleased to work with the Committee on these matters. The process is helpful and we value it. The Government are broadly supportive of the principles of the Hague programme as it stands; it was a good outcome for the UK when it was negotiated, and it remains so. In general, the format is right for the organisation of justice and home affairs work over the next few years. However, commitment to a programme as a whole does not mean that we must agree with the detail of all the proposals. I understand Members’ concerns about the passerelle. I made it clear to the Committee that the Government’s concerns featured prominently in negotiations on the justice and home affairs aspects of the draft constitutional treaty. I pointed out that"““the UK identified a number of substantive concerns, including the potential impact on national security, the extension of external competencies and the need for safeguards such as the emergency brake””." Those concerns remain valid, and given the strength with which Members raised them today, it is right to reiterate them. I take on board Members’ concerns about whether the position of the Commission has changed. However, there can be no move to the passerelle, and no move of measures from pillar 3 to pillar 1, without a unanimous vote at the Justice and Home Affairs Council. It is not relevant to talk of the back door. It has always been possible to move things from one pillar to another through a unanimous vote. It is not illegitimate that that issue should be raised, but that does not mean that that is what is going to happen. The emphasis on practical co-operation is right. That is where we want to be and that is where we want to direct our effort and see results. I urge hon. Members to support the motion. Question put:— The House divided: Ayes 275, Noes 130.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
453 c1275-6 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Immigration controls Undocumented migrants Human trafficking European Union International cooperation EU action EU justice and home affairs Voting methods Terrorism EU immigration Europol Eurojust
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk