Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].


Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

Perhaps it will help if I stand back, although these microphones are made to be spoken into when sitting down. This is a disreputable grouping. It covers too many subjects and forces us to have an extremely complicated debate which will prove difficult to follow. I have responded to this by degrouping a lot of my amendments; the noble Lord, Lord Beaumont, has responded by not speaking to most of his. Quite where we will end up in this state of chaos, I do not know, but I think it was a bad decision to try this on a group of this size and to insist on it. I rather wish that it had not been done.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c94GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Conditions of employment Appeals Courts Administration of justice Administration Assets Debts Cultural heritage Debt collection Certification Arrears Attachment of earnings Fees and charges Licensing Enforcement Eligibility Judiciary Exemptions Households Functions Judges Income Landlords Ownership Powers of entry Membership Public appointments Payments Museums and galleries Loans Staff Lord Chancellor's Department Non-departmental public bodies Tribunals Regulation Tenants Rents Sequestration of assets Council on Tribunals Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk