Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].

Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 119B: 119B: Clause 85, page 53, line 5, at end insert— ““(9) Where the judgment that is the subject of a charging order application relates to an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the court shall not make a charging order if an order under sections 129 to 135 of that Act is appropriate.”””” The noble Lord said: Amendments Nos. 119B and 119C refer to a situation in which there might be a conflict between what is in the Bill and what is in the Consumer Credit Act 1974. These two amendments seek to regulate that conflict. I believe that is also true of Amendment No. 119D in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford. I shall not move Amendments Nos. 120 to 122. I beg to move.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c119GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Conditions of employment Appeals Courts Administration of justice Administration Assets Debts Cultural heritage Debt collection Certification Arrears Attachment of earnings Fees and charges Licensing Enforcement Eligibility Judiciary Exemptions Households Functions Judges Income Landlords Ownership Powers of entry Membership Public appointments Payments Museums and galleries Loans Staff Lord Chancellor's Department Non-departmental public bodies Tribunals Regulation Tenants Rents Sequestration of assets Council on Tribunals Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk