Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].

Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

One of the reasons why a single day’s sitting was to be run over two days was because of time constraints on certain Members. I think it was agreed that the Committee would run from two o’clock to six o’clock. I, for one, will be in great difficulty if I have to come back after six o’clock, but it may be possible for me to do so in the circumstances. I cannot say whether it will be possible at this juncture. Perhaps adjourning during pleasure is a good idea, but I, at least, cannot be absolutely certain that I can be present when pleasure is at an end and the Committee begins again.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c127GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Conditions of employment Appeals Courts Administration of justice Administration Assets Debts Cultural heritage Debt collection Certification Arrears Attachment of earnings Fees and charges Licensing Enforcement Eligibility Judiciary Exemptions Households Functions Judges Income Landlords Ownership Powers of entry Membership Public appointments Payments Museums and galleries Loans Staff Lord Chancellor's Department Non-departmental public bodies Tribunals Regulation Tenants Rents Sequestration of assets Council on Tribunals Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk