Proceeding contribution from Lord Borrie (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]
I shall comment on Amendment No. 131. The noble Lord, Lord Lee of Trafford, explained that the £500 penalty laid down is inadequate and that a reference to the OFT could result in a more serious restraint of some sort on the estate agent concerned. However, one effect of the noble Lord’s amendment would be to deprive trading standards officers of their powers to impose a penalty. Trading standards officers are local authority officials with expert local knowledge of their part of the country, and it would be a pity if their role was excluded. I do not support Amendment No. 131 in so far as it excludes trading standards officers. I should declare an interest as a former president of the Trading Standards Institute and a current vice-president.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 688 c103GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Contracts Consumers Construction Direct selling Housing Estate agents Regulation Tenants
- Legislation
- Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:47:27 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368570
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368570
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_368570