Proceeding contribution from Meg Hillier (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 18 January 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Antisocial Behaviour.
Antisocial Behaviour
The hon. Gentleman raises the issue of the cost of penalty notices. Would he rather see those offenders go through the expensive and long-winded court process, in which the decision is made a long time after the event and at greater expense? Is that his party’s policy?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 455 c958
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- CCTV Crime prevention Alcoholic drinks Anti-social behaviour Housing Drugs Parents Police Motorcycles Police community support officers Young people Young offenders Anti-social behaviour orders Crime and disorder reduction partnerships Acceptable behaviour contracts
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:27:39 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370828
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370828
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_370828