Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Further Education and Training Bill [HL].


Further Education and Training Bill [HL]

I see the point of such a body having a declared set of objectives, and proposed sub-paragraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) seem absolutely right and centre course. I see also the point of having a duty to co-operate with local authorities, in view of all that we have said about the importance of bedding down in the community. However, proposed sub-paragraph (v) is a step too far. A duty to promote the well-being of all persons creates a rather broad set of responsibilities, which might provoke claims to the right to have one’s well-being promoted by the council. One’s well-being might require rather different attentions, on top of which, other bodies might take it as a reason to say, ““Well, if the LSC is doing this, we do not need to do it””. With that reservation, I see the point of the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c333GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Costs Apprentices Adult education Employment Further education Greater London Greater London Authority Learning disability Learning and Skills Council for England Educational institutions Local government Qualifications Membership Public appointments Staff Part-time education Standards Training Religion Sector skills councils Labour market Regional councils London Skills and Employment Board
Legislation
Further Education and Training Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk