Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Dearing (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Further Education and Training Bill [HL].


Further Education and Training Bill [HL]

I should like to say a few words in support of the arguments put forward by the right reverend Prelate. It is strange that where the Bill states that its purpose is to do this, that and the other—one of which is to make provision for institutions within the further education sector—it is not possible within the scope of this legislation to deal with the issues raised here. I agree that most of it is about financial and technical matters. But, as I read it, the purpose of the Bill should enable this to be covered. It is not a case of the faith groups versus the rest. At Second Reading, I was particularly impressed, and said so, that the humanists are on the list. This is not about religion, it is about the well-being of the whole human being. It would be a pity if this could not be considered because it is outside the scope of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c366GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Costs Apprentices Adult education Employment Further education Greater London Greater London Authority Learning disability Learning and Skills Council for England Educational institutions Local government Qualifications Membership Public appointments Staff Part-time education Standards Training Religion Sector skills councils Labour market Regional councils London Skills and Employment Board
Legislation
Further Education and Training Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk