Proceeding contribution from Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Further Education and Training Bill [HL].

Further Education and Training Bill [HL]

I am not persuaded by that argument. I cannot see what harm is being done. As the noble Lord said, the Bill refers to ““must have regard to””, so it is not imposing an obligation to consult those bodies, though they would have to take into account what the Minister says. I cannot quite see the logic of his argument.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 688 c371GC
Session: 2006-07
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects: Access Disability Costs Apprentices Adult education Employment Further education Greater London Greater London Authority Learning disability Learning and Skills Council for England Educational institutions Local government Qualifications Membership Public appointments Staff Part-time education Standards Training Religion Sector skills councils Labour market Regional councils London Skills and Employment Board
Legislation: Further Education and Training Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Further Education and Training Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools