Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Peter Kilfoyle (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 February 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Defence in the World.


Defence in the World

I am grateful to accept the hon. Gentleman’s advice. It adds strength to my argument: we need much wider debate before we rush in and make a decision. I do not say that as a member of CND like my right hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne, East and Wallsend (Mr. Brown). I have never been a member of CND—it is bad enough keeping up with the Labour party, never mind CND—but we need to engage in debate. Why are we being pushed into an early decision? I may be a little paranoid, but I see a Prime Minister who has been supportive of the defence establishment coming to the end of his term of office, and I see pressure being brought to bear on him by the industrial military establishment to get the decision through now. That establishment knows full well that a successor Prime Minister might take a more enlightened view—in my opinion—of what is needed for a British nuclear deterrent. That does not mean that there will be no deterrent, but that all other options will be explored, so that people are not bounced into a decision that they may come to regret.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
456 c428 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Defence Armed conflict Deployment Finance Iraq Police Nuclear weapons Peacekeeping operations Politics and government Navy Ministry of Defence Terrorism Training USA Afghanistan NATO Russia Iran Trident
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk