Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Coventry (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Mental Health Bill [HL].


Mental Health Bill [HL]

My Lords, in some senses I shall repeat what the noble Earl, Lord Howe, has just said, but in a less erudite manner. We have before us a number of important amendments which in many respects overlap, at least in intention if not in words. I am very grateful to the Government for producing Amendments Nos. 30 and 31, but if I had to choose I would be inclined to vote for Amendments Nos. 14, 15 and 16. I particularly welcome the inclusion of the test of therapeutic benefit in Amendments Nos. 14 and 15 and the special provision for patients under 18, including the requirement for the involvement of a clinician with special training in child and adolescent mental health. The discussions in Committee tipped the balance against the supposition that ECT for this age group should be banned, but its use requires stringent safeguards as provided in Amendment No. 15. Will the Minister reflect further on the overlapping nature of these amendments and produce a composite amendment at Third Reading that would take account of the very positive things contained in all of them?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c980-1 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Consent to medical treatment Community care Discharges Compulsorily detained psychiatric patients Diagnosis Electroconvulsive therapy Mental illness Medical treatments Mental capacity Patients' rights Psychiatric patients Mental health Psychiatry Training Young people Side effects Psychiatric hospitals
Legislation
Mental Health Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk