Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Patel of Bradford (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Mental Health Bill [HL].


Mental Health Bill [HL]

My Lords, it seems to me that the essential point of these amendments is to ensure that when a patient’s past or present wishes about treatment are not respected for whatever reason, the justification for this must be recorded by the decision-maker. This is a modest proposal in terms of legal duties, but I believe that it would have a significant and beneficial effect in the way in which patients’ wishes are addressed by services. It is, thanks to fairly recent case law, a requirement that any second-opinion doctor authorising treatment without consent must justify his or her decision in writing. This amendment would extend that requirement to other decision-makers who may be overriding patient wishes. In my view, and that of the courts, when the matter is brought to their attention, recording reasons is a very basic requirement of responsible and justifiable decision-making, where those decisions may interfere, or potentially interfere, with fundamental human rights. Some exemplary services may already make and record their decisions in such a way that would meet the statutory requirement that this amendment puts forward. Many unfortunately do not. It is on that basis that I support the amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c987 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Consent to medical treatment Community care Discharges Compulsorily detained psychiatric patients Diagnosis Electroconvulsive therapy Mental illness Medical treatments Mental capacity Patients' rights Psychiatric patients Mental health Psychiatry Psychiatric hospitals Training Young people Side effects
Legislation
Mental Health Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk