Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
After that contribution, I feel that we on this side of the Room will enjoy the Committee more than the Minister. Having listened carefully, the longer I listened to the Minister's reply, the more confused I got. If he is saying that we could achieve what the amendment of my noble friend Lady Thomas would achieve by doing things in another way, that does not answer the question asked by the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis. Are you going to do it or not? If we do not have an answer to that, it is not reasonable to ask my noble friend to withdraw her amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c16GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Children Disability living allowance Charities Benefits rules Administration Cancer Advisory services ME/CFS Employment Education Incapacity benefit Medical examinations Pilot schemes Qualifications Mental health Social security benefits Training Students Unemployed people Voluntary work Pathways to work programme
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:49:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377911
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377911
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377911