Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
I support my noble friend on that. There is a real problem in defining full-time education. There are universities where the formal contact hours amount to only four or six hours a week but the home study associated with them can be anything from four to 40 hours. At the same time, the students may be working 10, 20 or 30 hours a week in order to finance their way through university. My noble friend is right that to put that in the Bill would not be helpful because it would be necessary to define ““full-time education””, so it would merely postpone the definition. Guidance about what is training, education or part of a therapeutic work agenda and the advice of the advisers is a more appropriate way forward.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c20GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Children Disability living allowance Charities Benefits rules Administration Cancer Advisory services ME/CFS Employment Education Incapacity benefit Medical examinations Pilot schemes Qualifications Mental health Social security benefits Training Students Unemployed people Voluntary work Pathways to work programme
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:45:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377923
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377923
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377923