Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

Again, that is more of a departmental answer than the one I was hoping to get from the noble Lord, which perhaps I might better describe as a DTI answer. The noble Lord is naturally concerned with the construction of the benefit and is looking at the whole thing from the perspective of who we call ““the client””, and who I used to call ““the claimant””. I understand that. None the less, there is nothing more mentally debilitating than being on the work assessed group and going to interview after interview for a job for which you know, and indeed your adviser knows, you are perfectly well qualified, and not getting the wretched thing. That will eventually push some people on to the supported group, which is the last thing any of us wants.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c52GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Children Disability living allowance Charities Benefits rules Administration Cancer Advisory services ME/CFS Employment Education Incapacity benefit Medical examinations Pilot schemes Qualifications Mental health Social security benefits Training Students Unemployed people Voluntary work Pathways to work programme
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk