Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Adam Ingram (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 February 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Royal Navy.


Royal Navy

I cannot give the hon. Gentleman a precise answer, because the checks are ongoing, but I will say—he should know this, given the area that he represents—that the engineering input will be of the highest standard. The assessment of the risk presented by anything in any piece of equipment, whether for use in the air or elsewhere, has to be of the highest rigour, too. If there is cause to say that something should not be flying, sailing, or travelling on the land, the judgment will be made on a military and technical basis. The one thing that military personnel will not do is take risks with their own people, where those risks are clearly identifiable and can be dealt with. The analysis is ongoing, and it is to the credit of the RAF that it has identified the problem, acted quickly, and responded in a constructive way. We are talking about important air-maritime support equipment that is essential to what we are doing, not just in defence of our shores, but elsewhere.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
457 c657 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Deployment Defence equipment Finance Staff Navy Warships Aircraft carriers Submarines
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk