Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
Before the noble Baroness answers that, the noble Lord, Lord Kirkwood, has made a very valid point. We will shortly move on to Clauses 10 to 15, which concern conditionality. One worry—certainly it is a concern of mine, my noble friends and indeed the Joint Committee on Human Rights and others—is that conditionality might depend on a decision by someone who is not a direct employee but, rather, a contracted-out employee of the Secretary of State. That would be wrong, and perhaps the noble Baroness will include it in her thinking.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c181GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Disability living allowance Benefits rules Administration Depressive illnesses ME/CFS Fraud Employment Health Health professions Interviews Learning disability Incapacity benefit Medical examinations Mental illness Pilot schemes Unemployed people Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:48:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380464
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380464
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380464