Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

I agree with a lot of what the noble Lord said about the importance of engaging with these customers, making it specific, addressing people’s particular needs and having the flexibility in the system to do so. That is what is there. With respect, I take issue with some of the wild assertions about caseload overload and the system not working and so on. We must certainly not be complacent. A strong message has come from this engagement, and we must obviously take that seriously. On funding, I stress—and it has been stressed before, certainly at Second Reading—that the roll-out of Pathways is fully funded. I do not agree that personal advisers do not have sufficient time. The testimony of customers shows that the assertion is not correct. On using external providers, the contracts will specifically state the opposite—people cannot be ignored and all customers, with all conditions, have to be provided with support. That will be a key part of the contractual arrangements and part of the monitoring of the contracts that we put in place.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c202GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Disability living allowance Benefits rules Administration Depressive illnesses ME/CFS Fraud Employment Health Health professions Interviews Learning disability Incapacity benefit Medical examinations Mental illness Pilot schemes Unemployed people Employment and support allowance
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk