Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
I emphasise that I do not see the situation as being illogical. The level of benefit will be impacted by a potential sanction, however short the period that someone has accessed the benefit for. Obviously, that sanction might run for less than the full period provided for in the regulations if the person goes back into employment. That would be a really good outcome and we would be pleased. But as long as the work-related activity component is payable and a sanction is due, whether in the four-week period or the subsequent period, the sanction will be applied. Perhaps I am missing the noble Lord’s point, but I do not see why that would be illogical.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c219GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Disability living allowance Benefits rules Administration Depressive illnesses ME/CFS Fraud Employment Health Health professions Interviews Learning disability Incapacity benefit Medical examinations Mental illness Pilot schemes Unemployed people Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:50:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380549
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380549
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380549