Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill.


Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill

My Lords, I cannot be tied down to detail on expenditure but I have identified the purposes of that expenditure. That was the basis on which the Bill was put before the other place. The noble Baroness believes that such expenditure should be challenged, but this is not about implementing the Bill but about creating the framework within which it could operate if we embarked on that road. The Government are mindful that they are open to challenge, and that if we do not proceed because the work shows that this proposal lacks feasibility, the money authorised by the Bill will have been wasted. However, we have the right to travel in greater optimism than critics, for two reasons: first, we are going about this with due caution, and, secondly, the problem with criticism is that it is negative about an issue that wider society wants resolved because the present structures do not work. I commend the Bill to the House. On Question, Bill read a second time; Committee negatived.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c71 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Costs Housing Land ICT Infrastructure Local government Planning permission Planning Public expenditure Property development Valuation Taxation Rural areas Revenue and Customs Department for Communities and Local Government Planning gain supplement
Legislation
Planning-gain Supplement (Preparations) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk