Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 22 March 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Energy Efficiency and Microgeneration Bill [HL].


Energy Efficiency and Microgeneration Bill [HL]

I did not think the noble Baroness would have a change of heart on that point. I am heartened by her statements. It is important that the Government note that although PPS 22, in my view, strengthens the case for microgeneration, at a recent planning appeal on the erection of a wind turbine, PPS 22 was used by those objecting to the planning appeal as well as those trying to support it. So the wording for making a case for moving forward with microgeneration, rather than preserving the landscape, needs to be strengthened substantially. On that basis, I very much hope that there will be an opportunity for many in the other place to see the merits of this argument and crusade forward with it. Even if the Bill does not get much further, the debates will feed into a growing change within government and outside on the need to increase the stock of microgeneration, which can only be for the good. On Question, amendment agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c1430 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Agriculture Conservation Combined heat and power Housing Energy Electricity generation Home information packs Planning permission Property transfer Mortgages Wind power
Legislation
Energy Efficiency and Microgeneration Bill (HL) 2006-07
Development Orders (Microgeneration) Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk