Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
With respect, my Lords, the Minister misunderstood the intent of the amendment, as I understand it, and its wording. ““Taken as a whole? is very different from ““all the objectives?. If the Bill said, ““had an adverse impact on all the regulatory objectives?, I would see her point, but it does not. I think she seriously needs to think again about the effect of the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c253
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Consumers Costs Competition Competition Commission Legal profession Fines Exemptions Monitoring Standards Voluntary organisations Regulation Wills Legal Services Board Legal Services Consumer Panel
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:35:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_390429
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_390429
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_390429