Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Hoban (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

If one is a member of an occupational scheme, the contributions are subject to tax relief, and many such schemes clearly include death-in-service benefits. The Government are trying to remove the opportunity for those who are self-employed or not part of such a scheme to receive the tax relief on a stand-alone, pension term assurance policy. Another key principle that underpins the Government’s approach to pensions tax relief emphasises that point. The Red Book states that"““incentives for employer contributions are provided as it is more efficient for pensions to be provided on a collective basis through the employer””." What happens to those who are not in employment—the self-employed and temporary workers? They will not benefit from tax relief on a stand-alone policy. Indeed, other changes make it more difficult for them to get that tax relief. They will have to bite the bullet and not only pay the costs that we pay in our pension contributions and the sort of costs that the Exchequer pays into the parliamentary pension scheme, but get no tax relief. They are therefore hit by a triple whammy and in a far worse position than us as employees in the context of death-in-service benefit and how to fund it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c1394 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Codes of practice Crime Arrests Aviation Combined heat and power Climate change Bereavement benefits Fraud Income tax Electricity generation Police Pollution Powers Workplace pensions Pensions Life insurance Passengers Pension funds Tax allowances Taxation Revenue and Customs Renewables obligation
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk