Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Stamford (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
It is a curious way to conduct a debate to try to refute an argument by saying that it is different from what was said by another person who took the same line but used different arguments in support of the same cause. That may well be the case, but I take my stand on the matter of retrospectivity. Such an important principle is at stake here that I will vote to defend it whether or not I am joined by the majority of my colleagues. We have heard some other good arguments. For example, the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable) made some points of a practical character that tend in the same direction. The fact that there are other arguments from different sources that tend in the same direction hardly undermines my argument, which is based on the principle of retrospectivity.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c1423
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Crime Arrests Aviation Combined heat and power Climate change Bereavement benefits Fraud Income tax Electricity generation Police Pollution Powers Workplace pensions Pensions Life insurance Passengers Pension funds Tax allowances Taxation Revenue and Customs Renewables obligation
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:01:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393976
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393976
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393976