Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 May 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Housing.


Housing

I suppose that a backhanded compliment is better than no compliment at all. I will move on, if I may. I want to draw the House’s attention to a third aspect of Mr. McDonald’s evidence. He was persistently asked what he thought the cost to the consumer would be of the packs in the form that the Secretary of State proposes. After what might in other circumstances be described as some shilly-shallying, he said:"““It could be anything from nothing to several hundred pounds.””" He could provide no evidence that the packs would reduce the transaction time—the whole point of introducing them in the first place—he could not estimate the cost to the consumer, and he had to admit that the voluntary home condition report was going to be a dead letter. It is no wonder that the gloom among the Government has spread in the last few months as this situation has built to its climax.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
460 c648-9 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Costs Climate change Competition Housing Inspections Environment protection Energy Documents Grants Fuels EU action Home information packs Judicial review Gazumping Local government Pilot schemes Property transfer Loans Staff Valuation VAT Surveying Housing market First time buyers Carbon emissions Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Energy performance certificates
Legislation
Home Information Pack Regulations 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk