Proceeding contribution from Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 May 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Housing.
Housing
The hon. Gentleman makes an interesting point; that certainly is the evidence given by CML. We have tended in this debate to adopt extremely polarised views about home information packs and the associated costs and liabilities. As a Liberal Democrat, I always feel slightly uneasy at aligning myself with the National Association of Estate Agents, and one does have to take some of the criticism with a pinch of salt. Nevertheless, it has to be said that the Minister has failed to show the House any evidence that time will be saved in the overall transaction. There is no evidence on the likely cost imposition on consumers, and there is clearly no chance of home condition surveys catching on.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 460 c649
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Climate change Competition Housing Inspections Environment protection Energy Documents Grants Fuels EU action Home information packs Judicial review Gazumping Local government Pilot schemes Property transfer Loans Staff Valuation VAT Surveying Housing market First time buyers Carbon emissions Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Energy performance certificates
- Legislation
- Home Information Pack Regulations 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:32:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397185
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397185
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397185