Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hanham (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 17 May 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (Corresponding Amendments) Order 2007.
Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (Corresponding Amendments) Order 2007
My Lords, there is clearly nothing one can say to object to this order. It is eminently sensible. I can see why it has taken some time to come around to this: a number of Acts have to be amended in order to introduce it. It seems equitable in every term and perfectly proper. The Minister has forestalled the one question that I had buried in the back of my mind, which was whether this would extend the right of compensation. She said that the order has nothing to do with that, and one assumes that anything to do with compensation will come in under other provisions. I am very happy to accept that the order is appropriate.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c386
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compulsory purchase Land Planning Tenants
- Legislation
- Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (Corresponding Amendments) Order 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:31:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397560
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397560
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_397560