Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 May 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
That is a fair point and I thought that I touched on it earlier. I said that it would be outcome-focused, because we would then be able to see what was happening with a particular service—the way in which it was developed and delivered and the changes that it made. This issue is about quality as well as cost, and that needs to be factored into our considerations. I hope that I have answered the general points built around the useful amendment moved by my noble friend Lord Judd, which has triggered some interesting thinking. I hope that I have also responded in sufficient depth to some of the other points that were raised and that my noble friend will feel able to withdraw his amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c677-8
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Contracts Charities Women Equality Ethnic groups Offenders Private sector Public sector Probation National Probation Service for England and Wales Rehabilitation Standards Voluntary organisations Reoffenders Non-governmental organisations Probation trusts
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:23:43 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399701
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399701
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399701