Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Gibson of Market Rasen (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 June 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.


Offender Management Bill

I thank the Prison Officers Association for briefing me on the amendment. The Bill is currently silent about which restricted activities the Home Secretary plans to allow non-prison custody officers to perform. I understand that that will be revealed only when the Home Secretary publishes the order, which will be ““subject to negative procedure”” in relation to which restricted activities a worker may be authorised to carry out. Once the order has been passed, it will be for the director of the private prison to instruct non-prison custody officer staff to carry out some, if not most, of the currently restricted activities. Amendment No. 104 is, I believe, an attempt to clarify at least some of the restricted activity areas that may be the subject of any such authorisation and place them in the Bill. As such, I support it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c1502 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Detainees Offenders Private sector Prisons Public sector Staff Standards Training Young offenders Right of search Voluntary work Smuggling Secure accommodation Prison visitors Prison officers
Legislation
Offender Management Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk