Proceeding contribution from Tim Loughton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Mental Health Bill [Lords].
Mental Health Bill [Lords]
That is scaremongering and disingenuous argument of the worst kind. Which bit of the statement ““There is no evidence to suggest that the number subject to compulsion would be higher or lower under an impaired decision-making test”” does the Minister not understand? On which bit of that statement is she trying to misrepresent me?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 461 c1310
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Alcoholic drinks Community care Autism Compulsorily detained psychiatric patients Dangerous psychiatric patients Culture Diagnosis Finance Homicide Drugs Discrimination Ethnic groups Mental illness Medical treatments Northern Ireland Mentally disordered offenders Police custody Mental capacity Misuse Patients' rights Psychiatric patients Mental health services Mental health Prescriptions Paedophilia Scotland Religion Victims Sexuality Right of search Suicide Political doctrines Secure psychiatric units Community treatment orders Behaviour disorders
- Legislation
- Mental Health Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:58:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_404204
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_404204
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_404204