Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Danny Alexander (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 25 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

The new clause is clear on that point. The discount would apply to individuals who had their main residence in such areas, but the vehicles that they wished to use while claiming the discount would also have to be registered. The right hon. Member for Wokingham made a good point when he asked how we could protect against second home owners taking advantage of the discount. There are already schemes in place in which second homes have to be registered for certain purposes, such as the claiming of council tax discounts. Perhaps that information could be used for these purposes. Equally, it could be a requirement that the home that was registered for the purposes of the discount should be the person’s principal private residence for tax purposes. That does not wholly answer the right hon. Gentleman’s question, but it would at least partly tackle the issue that he has raised. International comparisons also exist. France, Greece and Portugal already take advantage of the derogation available under EU law, albeit for slightly different purposes.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c82 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Companies Costs Air passenger duty Committees Fraud Income tax Excise duties EU internal trade Legislation Internet Personal savings Low incomes Petrol Registration Small businesses Tax allowances Repayments Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Tax rates and bands Rural areas Second homes Tax evasion Revenue and Customs Equity Retrospective legislation
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk