Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 2 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on European Global Navigation Satellite System.


European Global Navigation Satellite System

I am saddened by the Opposition’s tone, particularly as they have forgotten that the Government’s position—and this is even accepted within the Commission—is that nothing that happens in Galileo should be outwith the financial perspectives. The 2013 financial perspectives are agreed—they will be maintained—and no one is giving them away. Sadly, I suddenly see in the Opposition a complete lack of ambition. They called the initiative a vanity project, but one of the Government’s prime decisions was to argue for small and medium-sized enterprises in Europe to be fully and openly involved in the development of anything to do with space policy or Galileo. The Opposition wish to stop that ambition, and they do not have any vision to offer Europe in the technological field at all. Instead, they will rely on GPS from America and hope that it will remain free, or they would rely on Russia, because its service will be free, or even China, which will also provide a free service. They do not, however, have the ambition to operate an independent system—[Interruption.] I hear an American voice.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c774 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
EU action Navigation Galileo system Global navigation satellite systems Satellite communications
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk