Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord James of Blackheath (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 July 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Gambling Act 2005 (Operating Licence Conditions) Regulations 2007.


Gambling Act 2005 (Operating Licence Conditions) Regulations 2007

My Lords, I commence with four expressions of regret. The first is to the noble Lord, Lord Davies, personally, because the poor noble Lord has already had enough of me for one day before he entered into this Chamber tonight. That he should get a second instalment this evening is a matter of regret. Secondly, I regret that this debate coincides precisely with the annual dinner of the all-party racing committee, which has rather depleted the resources of those who know much about the subject and who might otherwise have been here, instead of giving preference to their dinner. Thirdly, I regret that I made a mistake in declaring my personal interests in the Grand Committee last week, because it has been pointed out by a hawk-eyed analyst that I forgot to mention that I undertook the initial valuation of the value of the Tote on behalf of the Jockey Club. I apologise for that omission. My final regret is that we are not having an opportunity to debate all six instruments relating to the Gambling Act 2005 as an entity, because they hang together as one package. Taking them separately diminishes the strength of our argument. In Grand Committee, we had a clear view that we were talking about instruments that had two primary purposes. The first was to overcome the problems that would result during Recess in the event that the Gambling Act came into force, because at the moment there is no legitimacy beyond 1 or 3 September for the continuity of the Tote, unless its licence to trade as an exclusive pool-betting arrangement is allowed to continue. Secondly, the levy must be reinstated if it is to have any means of supporting the economic vitality of racing in this country. We recognise that racing carries a total employment of between 150,000 and 200,000 people, and is therefore vital to the rural communities of this country. The instruments before this House simply do not do the job and they are not, as they stand, a package which will do what the Government believe, expect and want of them.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c81-2 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Clubs Costs Bingo Casinos Licensing ICT Gambling Exemptions Gaming machines Lotteries Prize money Regulation Tickets
Legislation
Categories of Gaming Machine Regulations 2007
Gambling (Lottery Machine Interval) Order 2007
Gambling Act 2005 (Operating Licence Conditions) Regulations 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk