Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hanham (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 July 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.


Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

We have been talking about housing. Amendment No. 207, which my noble friend Lord Hanningfield and I support, refers to ““a housing association””. I understand what the Minister has said in that housing associations go wider than the boundary that might be covered by the local agreement, but a registered social landlord would not be in that position. It is housing associations or private landlords who work with the local authority, and it is a worry that housing is not in this list anywhere, if the housing association cannot be put in. For all the reasons that we know, particularly over-crowding and homelessness, the targets that it may be necessary to introduce may be very real. It may require the agreement of a local housing association or a local registered social landlord to deal with that. Perhaps if we changed the words ““a housing association”” to ““a registered social landlord””, that would make it easier for the Minister to accept the amendment at a later stage.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c66 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Administration Housing Further education Housing associations District councils Local government Offenders NHS Parish and town councils Probation Sixth form colleges Local area agreements
Legislation
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk