Proceeding contribution from Andy Slaughter (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 11 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.
Greater London Authority Bill
I am most grateful to the hon. Gentleman. I am pleased to see that the hon. Member for Henley (Mr. Johnson) has returned to the Chamber. I thought he might have gone off in a huff, having come to see his opponent disqualified and not received satisfaction from the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst. The hon. Gentleman is doing better on this amendment than on the last, although that is merely to damn him with faint praise. The problem with his argument is that it is quite clear why the strong mayoralty was set up with a qualified veto. So far, he has said nothing that detracts from that point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 464 c492
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disadvantaged Candidates Climate change Housing Health Elections Eligibility Greater London Energy Greater London Authority Planning permission Local government finance Public appointments Public expenditure Recycling Mayor of London Local government executive Waste management Carbon emissions London Assembly Political systems
- Legislation
- Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:38:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_416787
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_416787
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_416787