Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Beamish (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [Lords].


Legal Services Bill [Lords]

May I speak to amendment No. 76, which I tabled with my hon. Friend the Member for Bassetlaw (John Mann)? In Committee, we raised the need to increase the amount of compensation to a more realistic figure. I mentioned the case of Mrs. X of Stanley who could have lost £42,000 because of the negligence of Mark Gilbert Morse—a firm of solicitors in my constituency—regarding a miners' compensation case. I accept that Government amendment No. 96 increases the amount from £20,000 to £30,000, but the purpose of my amendment is to ensure that the amount of compensation does not stick, as has been the case for many years, at a derisory level and is not out of kilter with the extent of people's losses. Will the Minister explain what review mechanism is available to change the amount, if we accept the figure of £30,000 proposed in the Government amendment?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
464 c646 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Appeals Advisory services Conflict of interests Legal profession Fees and charges Licensing Judiciary EU law Exemptions Legal opinion Industrial diseases Law Society Misconduct Professions Public appointments Mining Ombudsman Lord Chief Justice Regulation Trade unions Rural areas Solicitors Trade marks General Council of the Bar Legal Services Board Office for Legal Complaints Alternative business structures Legal Services Consumer Panel
Legislation
Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk