Proceeding contribution from Lord Deben (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill..
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
As I apply those criteria to the decisions in Suffolk, it appears that the opposite decision was made and the opposite conclusion reached. I make no argument about whether that should have been the case or not, just that nobody understands because those five criteria have been applied differently in almost every circumstance. It is totally confusing to the electorate.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 465 c329
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Constituencies Councillors Community health councils Health services Elections Electoral Commission Functions Local government Misconduct Referendums Public participation Parish and town councils Local government executive Wales Social services Unitary councils Local involvement networks Patients' forums Commission for Patient and Public Involvement in Health Local Government Boundary Commission for England Northumberland
- Legislation
- Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:01:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_419476
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_419476
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_419476