Proceeding contribution from Paul Rowen (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
Does the Minister not accept that Sir David Henshaw argued against the 12-month rule in his review of the system? He said:"““The ability to move between systems after a year can in itself create instability and reduce the incentive to make an initial agreement.””" Those are his words, on page 27 of his review.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 468 c578
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Child support Children Compensation Appeals Crime Civil service Advisory services Asbestos Child Support Agency Fees and charges Information Industrial diseases Maintenance Parents Payments Parliamentary scrutiny Non-departmental public bodies Overseas residence Scotland Respiratory system Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:06:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_426168
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_426168
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_426168