Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].


Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]

No guarantee. However, the purpose of my amendment is to probe what happens. Although we hope it will not happen, it could, , and I have not had a complete set of satisfactory answers to my questions. We cannot necessarily rely on a successor fund being put together because that assumes the banks would, in effect, underwrite a successor scheme. Taking on the liabilities of the first scheme would mean that someone would have to put the money in to pay for it. My probing question was: what happens if it runs out of money? I think the Minister agrees with the noble Lord, Lord Newby, that the private sector would step in. But the Bill does not say so; it provides no remedy or set of solutions should that situation arise. Between now and Report I shall consider this point further because it is one of a series of points which raise the question, ““Does this thing fly?””. However, for now, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c76GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Databases Codes of practice Charities Companies Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Fraud Finance Financial Services Authority Private sector Lotteries Public bodies Registration Regulation Repayments Shareholders Big Lottery Fund Commission on Unclaimed Assets
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk