Proceeding contribution from Earl Attlee (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Local Transport Bill [HL].
Local Transport Bill [HL]
I am grateful for the Minister’s response. Of course, experienced parliamentarians know that there are only three types of opposition amendment. The Minister suggests that this one falls into the ““unnecessary”” class. I shall read Hansard carefully and, subject to the usual caveats, I beg leave to withdraw my amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 24 agreed to. Clause 25 [Making a scheme]: [Amendments Nos. 47 and 48 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c143GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Conditions of employment Contracts Appeals Bus services Competition Concessions Fares Franchises Local government Pensions Public transport Staff Partnerships Visual impairment Transport Traffic Commissioners Transport Tribunal
- Legislation
- Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:27:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429708
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429708
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_429708