Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Crossrail Bill.
Crossrail Bill
My Lords, I am grateful for what my noble friend said and I have no comment to make on it at all. However, looking at possessions for the construction of the link on the Great Western or Great Eastern, he said that that would be done under normal industry processes, which I welcome. However, Clause 32 gives power to the Secretary of State to override normal industry processes if he wants to. That is my problem. The Minister said he will pull back the railway clauses. If he gives us an assurance that he will remove Clauses 22 to 45 and the nasty thing in the back of the option agreement that says, ““If we do not like the option agreement we will remove it and give directions””, that would be fine. However, they are still there, and that is my worry.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c935
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Construction Elizabeth line Crossrail Finance Greater London Infrastructure Freight Heathrow Airport Private sector Ports Railway stations Railways Railway network Passengers Underground railways Transport for London Liverpool Street Station
- Legislation
- Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:02:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432423
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432423
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_432423