Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Climate Change Bill [HL]
I have a great deal of sympathy with the point of the right reverend Prelate but I think he ought to consider the wording of paragraph 3, which states that the authorities, "““must have regard to the desirability””" of experience of the factors listed in sub-paragraph (3)(a) to (i). His point does not exclude the Government from considering the experience of people involved internationally, but we are primarily considering domestic legislation. While there is an obligation on the Government to consider, as I have said, what is listed in sub-paragraph (3)(a) to (i), it does not preclude the Government from investing their experience in selecting somebody with wide international experience as well. I fail to understand, therefore, why it is necessary to include this particular provision, much as I have sympathy with the points which have been raised.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c1089
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Carbon dioxide Developing countries Environment protection Scottish Parliament Qualifications Public appointments Pollution control Standards Carbon emissions Climate Change Committee Carbon budgets
- Legislation
- Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-25 14:52:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433775
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433775
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_433775