Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 23 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Sale of Student Loans Bill.
Sale of Student Loans Bill
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, who is presenting his case with his usual aplomb, as did the Minister. Amendment No. 10 would introduce a new subsection (6)(d) in clause 3 that would"““include provision to prohibit transfers to another person outside the jurisdiction of the Secretary of State””." Can the hon. Gentleman say a little more about what the phrase ““outside the jurisdiction”” means in that context? In particular, is he seeking to address the fear that I expressed in Committee that we could have another Mapeley-type situation and that the debts could end up offshore? Or is he looking at a wider interpretation of the phrase?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 470 c1558
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Cost effectiveness Debts Debt collection Graduates Private sector Personal income Privatisation Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Sales Repayments Students Student Loans Company Cost of living
- Legislation
- Sale of Student Loans Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:51:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437984
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437984
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437984