Proceeding contribution from Martin Horwood (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 30 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on European Union (Amendment) Bill.
European Union (Amendment) Bill
I am grateful to the right hon. Lady for that clarification of the principle of subsidiarity, which still underlies this treaty as it did others. Let me move on to the amendments. It is interesting to note that the amendments tabled by Back-Bench Conservatives are more or less indistinguishable in effect from those tabled by Front-Bench Conservatives. We feared that the Europhobes would press down on the Front Bench—but they seem to have captured it. [Interruption.] I shall come to the subject of whether amendments are necessary in a moment, but we agree with the thrust of the treaty—[Interruption.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c417
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Competition Exports Energy European Union European communities EU institutions Oil Natural gas Treaties Renewable energy Russia Treaty of Lisbon
- Legislation
- European Union (Amendment) Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:42:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441311
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441311
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441311