Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 January 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Climate Change Bill [HL]
I do not have to write to the noble Lord; I shall answer him now. I have the finest brains in Whitehall drafting my notes. The term ““composite hereditament””, which he read out, is already covered by ““domestic premises””, as used in the schedule, so a separate category of composite hereditament is unnecessary. It means that ““domestic waste”” covers the element of waste collected from a composite hereditament, which means waste from domestic premises as opposed to commercial industrial waste, so the corner shop would get its domestic waste collected. That answers the noble Lord’s whole question, which is why I thought I could dispose of this quite quickly.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c681
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Climate change Biofuels Fees and charges Environment protection Landfill Food Fuels Domestic waste Incinerators Local government Pilot schemes Pollution control Recycling Packaging Standards Transport Waste management Carbon emissions Greenhouse gas emissions Aluminium
- Legislation
- Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:41:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441406
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441406
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441406