Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Cathcart (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 January 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].


Climate Change Bill [HL]

There seems to be an acceptance that everyone covered by a scheme will use all of it. It is quite conceivable that there are houses that do not use glass bottles. Tins, too, are not always part of the larder, except for emergencies that rarely occur. Most of all, there are many houses, particularly in the rural areas, where food waste, grass cuttings, fallen leaves and the like are an important ingredient of the compost heap. Are such people to be charged for something which they will not use? Amendments Nos. 183Q and 183S refer to sub-paragraphs whose explanation, in the Explanatory Notes, is simply a repetition of the wording in the Bill. The person liable for any charge would be the householder, so we agree that these subparagraphs should be removed, unless the Minister can give examples of other persons who might be liable under various schemes.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c692-3 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Companies Climate change Biofuels Fees and charges Environment protection Landfill Food Fuels Domestic waste Incinerators Local government Pilot schemes Pollution control Recycling Packaging Standards Transport Waste management Carbon emissions Greenhouse gas emissions Aluminium
Legislation
Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk