Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 31 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill.
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
I accept the point that the noble Baroness may be pressing. The commission has not drawn up detailed plans about how it expects to work with other departments of government. In a number of our debates, we have identified that there is a clear link to the work of the Department for Children, Schools and Families and that there would be cross-working and joint working with that department. What other departments might be involved depends on how the commission draws up its business plan and its corporate plan, and how that all fits together. It is not as though there is now a complete list of what the commission has in mind and which departments it will work with because it does not yet exist. It is the opportunity of working across government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c424GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Child support Children Contracts Contact orders Absent parents Contracts for services Child Support Agency Fees and charges Families ICT Information Maintenance Parents Poverty Parliamentary scrutiny Welfare tax credits Voluntary organisations Separation Children's centres Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
- Legislation
- Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:25:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441600
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441600
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_441600